Liability of E-commerce Platforms to Comply with Consumer Protection (E-Commerce) Rules, 2020 – Abhi Traders v. Fashnear Technologies Private Limited & Ors.
The Plaintiff, a clothing retailer under the brand name “IBRANA,” filed an interim application before the Delhi High Court against Defendant No. 1, Fashnear Technologies Private Limited, an operator of the e-commerce platform “meesho.com” and Defendants No. 2 to 10 who are clothing retailers for copyright infringement and passing off.
The Plaintiff alleged that the Defendants No. 1 to 9 and an unknown party being Defendant No. 10, were improperly using its copyrighted images to list/showcase their own products under the goodwill of the Plaintiff’s products on the platform Meesho (“Platform”) which led to a significant drop in Plaintiff’s sale of original/actual products on the Platform. Further, the Plaintiff contended that the Defendant No. 1 failed to disclose the seller details while listing its product on their Platform which is a requirement under Rule 5(3)(a) of the Consumer Protection (E-Commerce) Rules, 2020 (“Rules”). The Court noted that the said requirement under the Rules aimed to protect the buyers of an e-commerce platform by allowing them to take an informed decision.
The Court ruled in favour of the Plaintiff by granting an ex-parte ad interim injunction and passed an order issuing the following directions:
- prohibiting Defendants No. 2 to 9 from using Plaintiff’s copyrighted images or similar designs for listing Defendants’ products and from duplicating Plaintiff’s designs;
- Defendant No. 1 to disclose seller details including addresses, contact information, sales, GST details and payments made to sellers as per the Rules;
- Plaintiff to provide a list of infringing URLs to the Defendant No. 1’s counsel within seven (7) working days for the Defendant No. 1 to take down such URLs.
Recent Posts
- Bombay High Court Clarifies Interplay between Information Technology Act, 2000 and Indian Penal Code 1860, in Cybercrime Cases
- Auction Sale Set Aside by DRT Due to Default by the Bank: Supreme Court Enhances Rate of Interest to be Paid by the Bank Along with Refund Amount to the Successful Auction Purchaser | Tenants/Appellants being Successful Bidders Reverted to the Status of Tenants and Protected from Being Dispossessed by the Bank
- Incorporation of Arbitration Clause by Reference: A General Reference to A Contract Would Not Have the Effect of Incorporating the Arbitration Clause in Another Contract.
- Validity of the ‘Group of Companies’ Doctrine in the Jurisprudence of Indian Arbitration
- Law Commission Proposes Bill Codifying the Law Relating to Trade Secrets
- FSSAI Issues Advisory dated February 21, 2024, for Time-Bound Processing of Applications for Licenses Marked for Inspections
- Liability of E-commerce Platforms to Comply with Consumer Protection (E-Commerce) Rules, 2020 – Abhi Traders v. Fashnear Technologies Private Limited & Ors.
- Stamp Duty Reduction for Mining Deeds in Goa
- MEITY Advisory for Intermediaries on Use of Artificial Intelligence Models
- Courts Cannot Rewrite or Create a New Contract and Have to Simply Rely on The Terms and Conditions of The Agreement as Agreed Between the Parties