Spouse Has Children From Previous Marriage Is No Ground For Denial Of Maternity Benefit- Supreme Court
The Supreme Court in the case of Devika Singh v. CAT (C.A. No 5308 of 2022) recently held that existence of spouse’s biological children from his prior marriage would not impinge upon the statutory entitlement for grant of maternity leave. Moreover, the Court in its judgment made observations with respect to persons to whom maternity benefits shall not be denied due to absence of the traditional concept of ‘family’ The Court observed that-
1. The purpose behind maternity leave and other facilitative measures extended to women are to ensure that they are remain a part of the work force and are not compelled to leave their workplace.
2. Child birth has to be construed in the context of employment as a natural incident of life and hence, the provisions for maternity leave must be construed in that perspective and be provided to employees.
3. The concept of ‘family’ in law and society has undergone a change form the traditional idea that a family consists of a single, unchanging unit with a mother and a father (who remain constant over time) and their children. The Court observed that atypical manifestations of the family unit such as single parent household or unmarried partnerships or queer relationships are equally deserving of protection and benefits under the social welfare legislation shall be provided for. Moreover, the legislation shall not be interpreted to a woman’s disadvantage who undertakes the role of motherhood in ways that may not find a place in the popular imagination.
4. The right to reproduction and child rearing as an important facet of a person’s right to privacy, dignity and bodily integrity under Article 21. Moreover, Article 42 and Article 15 enjoins the State to make provisions for securing just and humane conditions of work and for maternity relief.
Recent Posts
- India’s New Startup Recognition Regime: Special Focus on Deep Tech Startups
- COMPARATIVE NOTE - LABOUR LAW CODES
- SEBI Issues Master Circular to Streamline Disclosure and Compliance in Debt Markets
- SEBI’S Approach to Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning: Exploring SEBI’S AI/ML Consultation Paper
- Clove Legal has successfully obtained a landmark order from the Hon’ble Bombay High Court directing MahaRERA to implement structured guidelines governing its hearing procedures and functioning framework.
- Regulatory Roundup: Key Corporate & Financial Law Updates
- Bombay High Court reprimands MahaRERA for not holding in-person hearings - Writ Petition filed by Clove Legal on behalf of aggrieved home buyer.
- Bombay High Court Clarifies Interplay between Information Technology Act, 2000 and Indian Penal Code 1860, in Cybercrime Cases
- Auction Sale Set Aside by DRT Due to Default by the Bank: Supreme Court Enhances Rate of Interest to be Paid by the Bank Along with Refund Amount to the Successful Auction Purchaser | Tenants/Appellants being Successful Bidders Reverted to the Status of Tenants and Protected from Being Dispossessed by the Bank
- Incorporation of Arbitration Clause by Reference: A General Reference to A Contract Would Not Have the Effect of Incorporating the Arbitration Clause in Another Contract.
